Today, integrating ESG criteria into a company’s overall strategy is no longer up for debate. However, the true value of an ESG approach often exceeds business perceptions, with benefits that can materialize faster than expected. Investor and consumer demands for responsibility and transparency have never been higher.
What is the real cost of inaction for businesses? What levers can ESG offer to create value? And how can ESG data be effectively leveraged to become a powerful driver of transformation and performance?
WHITEPAPER
Navigating ESG reporting : everything you need to know about essential standards and frameworks
Sustainable Transition: The Cost and Risks of Inaction
Transforming a business to be more sustainable and responsible may seem complex, costly, and uncertain. But what happens if you don’t act? And how much could inaction cost?
A lack of commitment and investment in the ESG transition exposes companies to various risks, with potential costs far exceeding those of a proactive transformation. It is essential to implement a strategy and choose the right ESG tools to track progress. But first, let’s examine the different types of risks.
The Costs of Physical Risks
Failure to act on climate change leads to an increase in extreme weather events, putting businesses at risk. According to the World Economic Forum, climate risks are expected to multiply and intensify over the next two decades. As long as human activities continue to emit greenhouse gases, extreme weather events—such as wildfires, storms, and floods—will become more frequent and severe. Studies have shown that human-induced climate change increases both the likelihood and intensity of these extreme events.
For example, by 2050, the European Union could experience five times more economic losses from floods. Additionally, the global economic costs of climate change have already doubled over the past 20 years.
The impacts of climate change generate significant material costs for businesses. In a scenario where global temperatures rise by +3°C by 2100—the most likely scenario—the financial impact on companies could range from 5% to 25% of their EBITDA, depending on the industry and geographic location. A study by the Boston Consulting Group reveals that while most businesses acknowledge climate risks, they often underestimate the scale of the associated costs.
Transition Risks
Transition risks refer to the potential impacts resulting from climate action and the shift toward a low-carbon economy. Companies that fail to anticipate this transition risk facing additional costs and a loss of competitiveness.
The main types of transition risks include:
- Regulatory risks: Stricter regulations on GHG emissions, carbon pricing, bans on certain products or polluting activities, etc.
- Technological risks: Companies reliant on carbon-intensive technologies (such as fossil fuels) may see their investments become obsolete as low-carbon technologies—like renewables, hydrogen, or carbon capture—gain traction.
- Financial risks: Decline in the value of fossil fuel assets, transition adaptation costs, and access to financing.
- Market risks: Changing consumer preferences and reduced demand for polluting products.
While these risks are not entirely certain, their intensification in the coming years seems highly likely. Moreover, as climate risks increase, the pressure for an accelerated transition will inevitably grow.
Companies that fail to anticipate these transition risks could face severe financial repercussions. For businesses dependent on fossil fuels, the end of subsidies and rising carbon costs could lead to a significant increase in operational expenses. Companies unable to decarbonize risk seeing their costs surge, directly impacting profitability—potentially reducing EBITDA by up to 50% by 2030.
Risks and Costs of Societal Transition
Beyond climate change and sustainability transition risks, companies face major challenges if they neglect ESG criteria—particularly social and societal aspects. Ignoring these dimensions can expose businesses to significant consequences in terms of reputation and compliance, leading to financial and competitive losses that threaten their long-term viability.
1. Scandals and Reputation Damage
Companies that overlook social criteria and societal impact risk severe reputational crises. These crises can lead to a major loss of trust from consumers, investors, and partners.
For example, the Rana Plaza disaster in 2013 exposed inhumane working conditions in the fashion industry. This tragedy triggered a massive boycott of certain fast fashion brands and prompted regulators to tighten supply chain oversight.
Another potential consequence: Companies facing ESG controversies often see their market capitalization drop by 10-15% on average in the months following the incident (source: MSCI study).
For businesses operating in high-risk areas, financial repercussions could be substantial if they fail to reassess and adapt their value chain and sourcing processes. A proactive transformation strategy is essential today to prevent costly non-compliance penalties and urgent, expensive adjustments in the future.
2. Stricter Social Regulations
The European Union has strengthened corporate obligations regarding human rights and social impact through regulations such as the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). This directive requires companies to identify, prevent, and mitigate risks related to working conditions, human rights, and the social impact of their activities.
Businesses failing to comply with these regulations face financial penalties, market access restrictions, and even legal action, which can severely harm their reputation and long-term operations.
ESG Strategy: A Driver of Value Creation
Today, implementing a sustainable strategy goes beyond simply aiming for a high ESG score. Companies that fully commit to ESG initiatives gain a return on investment and unlock new opportunities that would otherwise be out of reach.
Financial Opportunities
On the other hand, companies that invest in their sustainable and responsible transition reduce their exposure to risks while generating new opportunities. A study by the University of Cologne shows that the brand value of sustainability-focused companies increases by an average of 50%. In 2018, a Nielsen study revealed that 85% of young consumers were willing to pay more for sustainable products and solutions (source: EY).
From a financial perspective, businesses that prioritize ESG tend to achieve higher stock market returns. Additionally, they are perceived as less risky and more financially stable, allowing them to secure loans at better rates and achieve higher credit ratings (source: McKinsey).
Market Opportunities
Companies that significantly integrate ESG into their strategy gain a competitive advantage over those that do not. They are seen as responsible and trustworthy by regulators, increasing their chances of obtaining the necessary permits, licenses, and agreements to expand their business. They are also more likely to win contracts in highly regulated sectors or those requiring close collaboration with public authorities.
A McKinsey study provides a real-world example: in a major public-private infrastructure project in Long Beach, California, selected companies were chosen based on their sustainability track records.
Cost Reduction & Risk Mitigation
Companies that assess their exposure to climate and transition risks—and invest in climate adaptation—can achieve a return on investment of $2 to $19 for every $1 invested. For instance, flood protection measures can deliver benefits 2 to 7 times higher than their costs (source: WEF).
Additionally, resource optimization improves financial performance by mitigating rising operational costs, such as the increasing price of raw materials (source: McKinsey).
By adapting to change, businesses can implement strategic solutions to transform their business model and enhance their long-term resilience. They can also develop operational solutions to protect their assets and operations by minimizing climate-related risks. Furthermore, securing the resilience of their supply chain—or even their resource availability—is crucial. For example, companies can invest in water conservation technologies to ensure business continuity.
Turning ESG Data into a Performance Lever
The Benefits of Reliable & Actionable ESG Data
Reliable, actionable data is essential for deploying an effective ESG strategy. No company can progress without measuring its achievements or having the key insights to guide its decisions. ESG data is valuable for leadership teams, helping them understand corporate performance, anticipate risks, and implement proactive management strategies. It also plays a strategic role for sales teams, especially when bidding for contracts, as transparency in environmental performance is increasingly required.
An effective ESG data management approach transforms raw data into a true performance driver, boosting both revenue generation and operational efficiency.
How to Optimize ESG Data Collection & Utilization
Collecting ESG data remains a major challenge for companies, as information is often scattered across departments, subsidiaries, and countries. The lack of a unified data source, incomplete or inconsistent data, and the variety of reporting formats and regulatory requirements make data consolidation complex.
The Karbonpath ESG platform centralizes and standardizes ESG data in alignment with the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). Through an integrated approach, it provides a single source of truth, ensuring consistent and reliable data.
We enhance ESG data management by:
- Assigning data owners to each data point, ensuring a controlled collection and consolidation process.
- Tracking progress in real time, offering full visibility over data collection and organization.
- Automating data updates, ensuring that any modifications are instantly reflected across all documents and key indicators.
With Karbonpath, you can monitor all key performance indicators in real time, track the progress of your ESG objectives, and visualize action plans at any level of your organization.
The result? Significant time and efficiency gains. By reducing manual tasks, companies free up valuable resources—eliminating months of tedious work.
Want to find out more?
Let’s talk! Our team is here to help you.